The State GOP will vote this weekend on a proposed rule to institute a caucus to select the state’s presidential primary winner. I’ve been pondering this issue for a couple of weeks now and I have to admit – I really don’t know how I feel about it.On one hand, it’s an excellent way to generate enthusiasm early in the political season. On the other hand, does anyone think the enthusiasm level will remain high for the second and third tier candidates come June?In one scenario, Montana republicans could make their presidential preference known before the fait was accompli’d, so to speak. In an alternate scenario, due to the front-loaded nature of the primaries and the relatively huge number of viable candidates, there may not be a “clear frontrunner” by the time Montana’s regularly scheduled June primary rolls around. In that event, our seemingly paltry number of delegates could make the difference on the first ballot at the convention. Which, of course, would make Montana a really popular vacation spot for late May and early June for the likes of the Romney, Guiliani, Thompson, and Huckabee families. Possibly even the McCain’s. Just think of the boost that would give the tourism industry. Not to mention the political industry.See what I mean? It’s hard. I’ve heard it said that the definition of “mixed emotions” is watching your mother-in-law drive your brand new car over a cliff.Anybody want to say “bye” to Mom before she goes?